Based on this YouTube video's total view count of 94.0K views and industry-standard rates, the estimated total earning is $66 - $188 through ad revenue. Historical data is not yet available to calculate daily, weekly, or monthly averages.

Explore Delete Your Brain Games (And Start Doing These 4 Things Instead) with 94,052 views, 2,243 likes, and 156 comments. Experience the impact of this video content that has captured audience attention.

Over 70 million people have signed up for “brain training” apps, often buying subscriptions for an aging parent, believing that 10 or 15 minutes a day of matching tiles and tapping sequences will keep their memory sharp and hold off dementia. Here is the uncomfortable TRUTH almost no one hears: federal regulators found there was no solid science behind that promise, and the company making the most famous version paid to settle charges that it preyed on people’s fear of decline. The logic feels airtight. Lift weights and your muscles grow, so train your brain and it should get stronger too. But that is not what the research shows. When you play these games every day, you reliably get better at one thing: those exact games. Whether that improvement carries over to real life, remembering where you left your keys, managing your day, or actually lowering dementia risk, is something the industry has never been able to prove. In this deep dive I explain the science regulators and researchers actually rely on, the crucial difference between “near transfer” and “far transfer,” why that distinction quietly dismantles the entire brain-game sales pitch, and what the evidence says genuinely does protect an aging brain. The good news: the things that work are mostly free. WHAT YOU’LL LEARN - Why the FTC took action against a leading brain-training company, and what it was barred from claiming - “Near transfer” vs. “far transfer,” and why games only deliver the first one - Why getting faster at a game does not mean a sharper mind in daily life - What large studies suggest actually helps protect cognition, and why most of it costs nothing - How to tell a genuine brain-health habit from a well-marketed subscription CHAPTERS 0:00 The brain-game promise millions believe 1:23 The FTC steps in: the Lumosity case 3:32 Near transfer vs. far transfer, explained 4:46 The ping pong example 6:00 Why brain games deliver only near transfer 9:00 What the big independent studies (and ACTIVE) found 12:00 Fear-based marketing, and why “it can’t hurt” still costs you 14:40 What genuinely protects an aging brain 16:00 Exercise: the closest thing to a magic pill 17:20 Sleep, social connection, and learning something truly new 19:50 The bottom line: spend your time and money wisely FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Do brain training games actually prevent dementia? There is no strong scientific evidence that commercial brain games prevent dementia or reverse age-related cognitive decline. In 2016 the FTC acted against Lumosity for making such claims without the science to back them up. What happened with Lumosity and the FTC? The FTC charged that Lumosity’s maker deceived consumers by claiming its games could stave off memory loss, dementia, and Alzheimer’s. The company settled in 2016, agreeing to a judgment (a $2 million payment, with a larger amount suspended), easier cancellations, and a ban on unsupported claims. What is the difference between near and far transfer? Near transfer is when practicing a skill improves very similar tasks, like how table tennis helps you pick up pickleball. Far transfer, which brain games promise, is when a narrow task improves broad, unrelated real-life abilities, and it has been very hard to demonstrate. What actually helps protect your brain as you age? The strongest evidence points to regular physical exercise, strong social connection, good sleep, managing blood pressure and hearing, and learning genuinely new and challenging skills, most of which cost little or nothing. SOURCES & REFERENCES 1. U.S. Federal Trade Commission action and 2016 settlement with Lumos Labs (Lumosity), and the statement by Jessica Rich, then director of the FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection. 2. The 2014 consensus statement from roughly 70 scientists questioning brain-training claims. 3. Cognitive psychology research on near versus far transfer; the ACTIVE trial on cognitive training in older adults. 4. Evidence on exercise, social engagement, sleep, and lifestyle factors in cognitive health. If you or someone you love spends time or money on these apps, or simply worries about memory, please like this video and share it with them. An honest, evidence-based conversation is one of the best ways to protect people from paying for false hope. Tell me in the comments: have you or a family member ever subscribed to a brain-training app? ABOUT Neal K. Shah is a Johns Hopkins- and NIH-funded caregiving researcher and CEO of CareYaya, and has helped thousands of families navigate aging, dementia, and serious illness. This channel breaks down the health news that affects families and caregivers. DISCLAIMER: Educational and commentary only; reflects my analysis and opinion as a researcher, not a clinician. Not medical advice. Please consult a qualified professional about memory concerns or your brain health. #BrainHealth #Dementia #HealthyAging

With SocialCounts.org’s view counter, track your YouTube video’s live view count and YouTube likes count in real time with fast, reliable updates.

Watch every YouTube video live view count rise with our real-time YouTube views tracker—built for accuracy and minimal delay.

Follow YouTube real time views as they happen, using our dedicated view counter for YouTube videos.

Get up-to-date live view count on YouTube and see real-time growth with SocialCounts.org’s smart tracking tools.