Based on this YouTube video's total view count of 105K views and industry-standard rates, the estimated total earning is $74 - $210 through ad revenue. Historical data is not yet available to calculate daily, weekly, or monthly averages.

Explore Hamsaanandini Nanduri v UOI Explained | Adoptive Mothers & Maternity Benefits | Imp Judgment of 2026 with 105,172 views, 761 likes, and 38 comments. Experience the impact of this video content that has captured audience attention.

Hamsaanandini Nanduri v. Union of India (2026) is an important 2026 Supreme Court judgment on maternity benefits for adoptive mothers, adoption, reproductive autonomy, equality, and the right to a dignified life under Article 21. The Supreme Court considered whether restricting maternity benefits to adoptive mothers who adopt a child below three months of age is constitutionally valid. In this video, we explain Hamsaanandini Nanduri v. Union of India in a simple and structured manner, covering the case facts, legal issues, the three-month age condition for adopted children, Articles 14 and 21, Section 60(4) of the Code on Social Security, 2020, the Maternity Benefit Act, reproductive autonomy, the best interests of the child and the Supreme Court’s approach to maternity protection for adoptive mothers. 📚 Important Judgments of 2026 (Full Playlist): https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj61oJGRK5Y4igNwAkGtZJqxRCxhBxOT6 🎓 CLAT PG Crash Course: https://finologylegal.in/courses/clat-prep/clat-pg-crash-course 🧪 Judgment Assessments: https://forms.gle/d6H1uGwetJv2cJXt7 📽️ Case 4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJ9EoISf130&feature=youtu.be 00:00 – Hamsaanandini Nanduri v. Union of India (2026) 00:48 – Section 60(4) Code on Social Security, 2020 01:21 – Adoption Process & Three-Month Age Restriction 03:12 – Is the Three-Month Cut-Off Valid? 03:37 – Article 14: Intelligible Differentia & Rational Nexus 04:30 – Maternity Benefits & Three-Month Age Restriction 05:42 – Article 21 & Reproductive Rights 07:21 – Key Findings of the Hamsaanandini case 08:40 – Key Takeaways & Conclusion Key Takeaway: The Supreme Court examined the distinction between adoptive mothers based on the age of the adopted child and held that the three-month age condition could not be sustained under the constitutional framework. The judgment also discusses maternity protection as connected with motherhood, child welfare and constitutional rights

With SocialCounts.org’s view counter, track your YouTube video’s live view count and YouTube likes count in real time with fast, reliable updates.

Watch every YouTube video live view count rise with our real-time YouTube views tracker—built for accuracy and minimal delay.

Follow YouTube real time views as they happen, using our dedicated view counter for YouTube videos.

Get up-to-date live view count on YouTube and see real-time growth with SocialCounts.org’s smart tracking tools.