Channel BannerChannel Banner
PLW0MObtVUsPLW0MObtVUs

Two Loose Cords. Does It Still Fall?

30,225
Socialcounts.OrgEnter Fullscreen (f)
435
likes
2
comments
daily view 0
monthly view 0

Share

Live Analytics

Comments 0

Two Loose Cords. Does It Still Fall? Analytics Table

Income Estimates for Two Loose Cords. Does It Still Fall?

Based on this YouTube video's total view count of 30.2K views and industry-standard rates, the estimated total earning is $21 - $60 through ad revenue. Historical data is not yet available to calculate daily, weekly, or monthly averages.

About Two Loose Cords. Does It Still Fall?

Explore Two Loose Cords. Does It Still Fall? with 30,225 views, 435 likes, and 2 comments. Experience the impact of this video content that has captured audience attention.

The spring paradox: burn a string and the weight settles 103 mm higher. What the reel shows: a 0.30 kg weight hangs on two springs (11.8 N/m, 0.10 m long) joined by a 0.06 m string. Burn the string and it drops onto a pad. Add two cords hanging loose beside the springs, each with 0.02 m of slack between the two paths, burn the string again: the cords snap straight, the weight leaps 187 mm above its start, then settles 103 mm higher. A rig with 3 springs and 4 cords does it again: leap 288 mm, settled 155 mm. Add two loose cords, burn the string between two springs and the weight goes up, not down. Why: springs in series each carry the whole load F, so each stretches F/k. Cut the link and the load splits over two parallel paths, each carrying half, so each spring is shorter by F/2k, and the weight rises by that much less the cords' slack. In general, rise = (1 − 1/n) F/k − δ: with F/k = 249 mm and δ = 20 mm, 104.7 mm for 2 springs and 146.3 mm for 3 (the screen's 105 and 146). Simplified: that law has massless springs. The reel's 103 and 155 mm keep each spring's mass as a lump, the lean of the spring eyes and 0.15 N of friction on the guide rods (a judgment), so they sit a few millimetres off the law. Left out: each steel tie arm's mass (about 1 g, which would shift the 3-spring run about 1 mm settled and 3 mm at the leap) and a real spring's initial tension. The tie arms are drawn 3 mm thick, 1.5 mm in fact, and the spring wire 3.2 mm, 1.1 mm in fact, to be seen. Sources: J. E. Cohen and P. Horowitz, «Paradoxical behaviour of mechanical and electrical networks», Nature 352, 699 (1991); Y.-Y. Chen, «On a Mechanical Analogue of the Braess Paradox», Chinese Journal of Physics 43, 1004 (2005). The paradox is the mechanical cousin of Braess's paradox, where adding a road can slow traffic. No voice, no music: every sound is a cause on screen, the torch's hiss, the string's burn, the cords snapping taut, the coils shutting. #physics #springs #braessparadox

About YouTube Real-Time View Count

With SocialCounts.org’s view counter, track your YouTube video’s live view count and YouTube likes count in real time with fast, reliable updates.

Watch every YouTube video live view count rise with our real-time YouTube views tracker—built for accuracy and minimal delay.

Follow YouTube real time views as they happen, using our dedicated view counter for YouTube videos.

Get up-to-date live view count on YouTube and see real-time growth with SocialCounts.org’s smart tracking tools.

Embed Widget

Parameters:

  • fullscreen=true - Fullscreen counter
  • graph=true - Live graph chart
  • counter=0/1/2 - Select counter (0=likes, 1=views, 2=comments)
URL

Click to copy the embed URL to your clipboard