Based on this YouTube video's total view count of 9.87K views and industry-standard rates, the estimated total earning is $7 - $20 through ad revenue. Historical data is not yet available to calculate daily, weekly, or monthly averages.

Explore Lil Durk’s Phone: Did Police Seize It Illegally? with 9,877 views, 302 likes, and 26 comments. Experience the impact of this video content that has captured audience attention.

Lil Durk, whose legal name is Durk Banks, is asking a federal judge to suppress evidence obtained from one of his phones. The judge has been asked to decide whether law enforcement lawfully seized and retained the phone, and whether the federal government can use evidence from it at trial. In this video, Attorney Jasmine Mines briefly breaks down Lil Durk’s motion to suppress, the government’s response, the five-week period before investigators obtained another warrant covering the phone, and what could happen depending on how the judge rules. But there is another issue that has received far less attention. If the judge excludes important evidence, federal prosecutors may be able to seek appellate review before trial. If the judge allows the evidence and the ruling goes against the defendant, the defendant ordinarily does not have the same immediate appeal route and may have to wait until after final judgment. So even a favorable ruling could create another question: could winning the suppression motion delay the trial? ___ This video explains: Lil Durk’s phone evidence The motion to suppress The 2021 Georgia search and seizure The defense’s Fourth Amendment argument The federal government’s response The five-week warrant issue What happens if the evidence is suppressed Government pretrial appeals The Ninth Circuit What happens if the defense loses ___ Subscribe for court-document breakdowns, criminal law explanations, federal case updates, and analysis from Attorney Jasmine Mines. Follow me on instagram: @ATTORNEYJASMINE ___ This video is commentary and analysis based on court filings and publicly available information. This is not my case or my client. My discussion of legal issues and filings is without regard to personal feelings about any individual or his attorney. Allegations discussed in the video are allegations unless and until proven in court. These are my opinions, not specific legal advice. I have not formed an attorney-client relationship with you. Attorney Advertising. SBN 331135. Los Angeles CA. Photo Credit. “Lil Durk and Sonja Marziano (cropped)” Photograph by Daniel X. O’Neil Source: Wikimedia Commons commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lil_Durk_and_Sonja_Marziano_(cropped).jpg License: Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic, CC BY 2.0 creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/Changes: Image cropped/resized/altered and incorporated into this video. #LilDurk #LilDurkTrial #CriminalLaw

With SocialCounts.org’s view counter, track your YouTube video’s live view count and YouTube likes count in real time with fast, reliable updates.

Watch every YouTube video live view count rise with our real-time YouTube views tracker—built for accuracy and minimal delay.

Follow YouTube real time views as they happen, using our dedicated view counter for YouTube videos.

Get up-to-date live view count on YouTube and see real-time growth with SocialCounts.org’s smart tracking tools.