69
likes
11
comments
daily view 0
monthly view 0
Live Analytics
Comments 0
Science、Nature、Cell 總編輯同台：AI 審稿很厲害，責任仍得由人來扛 【AI 大人說】 Analytics Table
Income Estimates for Science、Nature、Cell 總編輯同台：AI 審稿很厲害，責任仍得由人來扛 【AI 大人說】
Based on this YouTube video's total view count of 9.68K views and industry-standard rates, the estimated total earning is $7 - $19 through ad revenue. Historical data is not yet available to calculate daily, weekly, or monthly averages.
About Science、Nature、Cell 總編輯同台：AI 審稿很厲害，責任仍得由人來扛 【AI 大人說】
Explore Science、Nature、Cell 總編輯同台：AI 審稿很厲害，責任仍得由人來扛 【AI 大人說】 with 9,683 views, 69 likes, and 11 comments. Experience the impact of this video content that has captured audience attention.
原素材（Broad Institute《Who Did the Analysis? Editors on Disclosure and Peer Review in the Age of AI Agents》，86 分 30 秒）：https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q04PAohvSYU Science 總編輯說，過去 20 年交上來的程式碼，大多從沒被真正跑過。 Science、Nature、Cell 與 NEJM AI 的四位編輯，在 Broad Institute 的線上座談談 AI 如何改變研究與同儕審查。 主辦單位的問卷顯示，研究者願意讓 agent 幫忙跑資料，卻不願讓 AI 評判自己的論文。 片中也談到 NEJM AI 的快速審稿實驗、Nature 對保密與研究功勞的擔心，以及一般聊天工具為什麼不適合直接拿來審稿。 最後的問題很簡單：AI 可以做出分析與審稿意見，但論文出了錯，責任仍得由人來扛。 章節 00:00 四位頂刊編輯是誰 00:54 大家要 AI 幫忙，不要它評判 01:44 20 年來，程式碼大多沒跑過 03:23 NEJM AI 的快速審稿實驗 04:26 稿子進模型，功勞算誰的 05:58 AI 寫作擋不住 06:57 同兩個模型會不會讓審稿單一化 09:02 AI 能不能掛名
About YouTube Real-Time View Count
With SocialCounts.org’s view counter, track your YouTube video’s live view count and YouTube likes count in real time with fast, reliable updates.
Watch every YouTube video live view count rise with our real-time YouTube views tracker—built for accuracy and minimal delay.
Follow YouTube real time views as they happen, using our dedicated view counter for YouTube videos.
Get up-to-date live view count on YouTube and see real-time growth with SocialCounts.org’s smart tracking tools.
Embed Widget
Parameters:
fullscreen=true- Fullscreen countergraph=true- Live graph chartcounter=0/1/2- Select counter (0=likes, 1=views, 2=comments)
URL
Click to copy the embed URL to your clipboard