Channel BannerChannel Banner
fgVpVHL8nkYfgVpVHL8nkY

Risks and benefits with Professor Fenton

400,260
Socialcounts.OrgEnter Fullscreen (f)
10,969
likes
2,149
comments
daily view 0
monthly view 0

Share

Live Analytics

Comments 0

Risks and benefits with Professor Fenton Analytics Table

Income Estimates for Risks and benefits with Professor Fenton

Based on this YouTube video's total view count of 400K views and industry-standard rates, the estimated total earning is $280 - $801 through ad revenue. Historical data is not yet available to calculate daily, weekly, or monthly averages.

About Risks and benefits with Professor Fenton

Explore Risks and benefits with Professor Fenton with 400,260 views, 10,969 likes, and 2,149 comments. Experience the impact of this video content that has captured audience attention.

Relative risk versus absolute risk with Professor Norman Fenton, Mathematician, Professor of Risk Information Management Professor Fenton, YouTube channel http://youtube.com/@normanfenton81 And Sub stack https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/ normanfenton.com Link to video on Norman's channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Va9aE98cFCA Download the slides used in this video https://d7694293-ffb8-4ed0-a014-3581d49070e4.usrfiles.com/ugd/d76942_9aec73e0e123495dba17f070437aadc8.pdf Nor What is risk information management? Thinking about risk, what do we mean by absolute risk and relative risk Sounds a bit like the level of risk can be presented in a way that gives a particular impression of a greater or a lessor risk or benefit? Are there occasions when a vested interest might want to give an impression of an increased benefit, or reduced risk from an intervention? How could choosing RRR versus ARR influence the impression given for adverse reactions is medical journals? Conversely Are there occasions when a vested interest might want to give an impression of a decreased risk from an intervention? So will RRR always be higher than ARR? Why can the RRR vary between populations and vary over time? So using one of the two measures to estimate the risk/benefit ratio would lead to different conclusions? How could risk / benefit reporting be optimised in the medical literature? Do you think the editors of prestigious international journals are aware of the differences between RRR and ARR? In the case of this paper from the Journal of Expert Reviews of Vaccines Efficacy and effectiveness of covid-19 vaccine - absolute vs. relative risk reduction https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9115787/ The original phase three data gave an efficacy for Pfizer vaccine, at preventing infection with SARS-CoV-2 of 95%, but it turns out the ARR was 0.84% Why are these figures so different? So is it fair to say that the ‘real world translation’ of the ARR of the Pfizer vaccine over 5 to 6 months of use increased to 3.7%? What do we mean by number needed to treat?

About YouTube Real-Time View Count

With SocialCounts.org’s view counter, track your YouTube video’s live view count and YouTube likes count in real time with fast, reliable updates.

Watch every YouTube video live view count rise with our real-time YouTube views tracker—built for accuracy and minimal delay.

Follow YouTube real time views as they happen, using our dedicated view counter for YouTube videos.

Get up-to-date live view count on YouTube and see real-time growth with SocialCounts.org’s smart tracking tools.

Embed Widget

Parameters:

  • fullscreen=true - Fullscreen counter
  • graph=true - Live graph chart
  • counter=0/1/2 - Select counter (0=likes, 1=views, 2=comments)
URL

Click to copy the embed URL to your clipboard