

AI Hackers Can Attack Faster Than Humans Can Respond | Neal Iyer | Splunk | EP 65
98,060
Socialcounts.Org
844
likes
52
comments
daily view 0
monthly view 0
Live Analytics
Comments 0
AI Hackers Can Attack Faster Than Humans Can Respond | Neal Iyer | Splunk | EP 65 Analytics Table
Income Estimates for AI Hackers Can Attack Faster Than Humans Can Respond | Neal Iyer | Splunk | EP 65
Based on this YouTube video's total view count of 98.0K views and industry-standard rates, the estimated total earning is $69 - $196 through ad revenue. Historical data is not yet available to calculate daily, weekly, or monthly averages.
About AI Hackers Can Attack Faster Than Humans Can Respond | Neal Iyer | Splunk | EP 65
Explore AI Hackers Can Attack Faster Than Humans Can Respond | Neal Iyer | Splunk | EP 65 with 98,060 views, 844 likes, and 52 comments. Experience the impact of this video content that has captured audience attention.
AI attackers can now move at a speed and scale that traditional security operations were never designed to handle. In this episode of **So What About AI Agents**, Philippe Trounev sits down with **Neal Iyer, Director of Product Management for AI at Splunk Security**, to talk about what happens when autonomous AI agents become part of both the attack and defense side of cybersecurity. Neal breaks the new threat landscape into three forces: **scale, speed, and sophistication**. AI can give relatively unsophisticated attackers capabilities that previously required much more expertise, while autonomous attacks can move so quickly that a security team celebrating a five-minute detection time may already be too late. We get into: ⢠How AI changes the economics of cyber attacks ⢠Why cheap AI agents can dramatically increase the number and sophistication of attacks ⢠Why traditional SOC response times may no longer be fast enough ⢠How prompt injection creates a new attack surface for defensive AI agents ⢠Why simply deploying more security agents isn't enough ⢠Building a security āharnessā around autonomous agents ⢠Runtime monitoring, guardrails, observability, and human escalation ⢠When security agents should act autonomously ā and when a human needs to stay in the loop ⢠Using business context to distinguish between compromising an intern's laptop and locking out a CEO ⢠Why security tools need better integration for agentic operations ⢠How organizations can start testing their agents against prompt injection and other attacks today ⢠Why Splunk and Cisco are exploring purpose-built small language models for cybersecurity ⢠The role of open-source, self-hosted, and multi-model AI strategies ⢠Why AI security economics may force companies to rethink how they store and process security data We also get into the broader question of whether frontier AI companies can really replace specialized enterprise software ā or whether impressive demos fall apart when customers need reliability, support, governance, and measurable outcomes. The bigger takeaway is that the future SOC probably isn't humans versus AI attackers. It's **agents fighting agents ā with humans designing the systems, permissions, guardrails, and escalation paths that keep those agents under control.** Subscribe to **So What About AI Agents** for conversations with the people actually building and deploying AI agents in production. https://www.docsie.io
About YouTube Real-Time View Count
With SocialCounts.orgās view counter, track your YouTube videoās live view count and YouTube likes count in real time with fast, reliable updates.
Watch every YouTube video live view count rise with our real-time YouTube views trackerābuilt for accuracy and minimal delay.
Follow YouTube real time views as they happen, using our dedicated view counter for YouTube videos.
Get up-to-date live view count on YouTube and see real-time growth with SocialCounts.orgās smart tracking tools.
Embed Widget
Parameters:
fullscreen=true- Fullscreen countergraph=true- Live graph chartcounter=0/1/2- Select counter (0=likes, 1=views, 2=comments)
URL
Click to copy the embed URL to your clipboard