27,538
likes
4,180
comments
daily view 0
monthly view 0
Live Analytics
Comments 0
đ´You Wonât BELIEVE What the Post-Debate POLLS Are Saying!!! Analytics Table
Income Estimates for đ´You Wonât BELIEVE What the Post-Debate POLLS Are Saying!!!
Based on this YouTube video's total view count of 645K views and industry-standard rates, the estimated total earning is $452 - $1.29K through ad revenue. Historical data is not yet available to calculate daily, weekly, or monthly averages.
About đ´You Wonât BELIEVE What the Post-Debate POLLS Are Saying!!!
Explore đ´You Wonât BELIEVE What the Post-Debate POLLS Are Saying!!! with 645,208 views, 27,538 likes, and 4,180 comments. Experience the impact of this video content that has captured audience attention.
Visit http://fieldofgreens.com and use promo code GARDNER for 15% off and free shipping. Stephen Gardner and Terry Schilling https://americanprinciplesproject.org/ discuss the disaster ABC debate. But whats shocked us both is the polling and the independent voter response. Follow on Twitter https://x.com/Schilling1776 This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewersâ perceptions of the information presented at the debate. There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span. This is not âbias." Itâs much worse. This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of âfact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a âfact checkâ confers validity to the non-fact-checked information. When one side is repeatedly âfact checked,â while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is. The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed. Letâs watch the clip and then Iâll prove the lies. Run Trump against 3 video 1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamalaâs behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesnât acknowledging the validity of Trumpâs statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her âanswer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange. 2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check. 3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trumpâs âpeacefully and patrioticallyâ comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check. 4) Kamala says that âsome" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check. 5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville âFine Peopleâ hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check. 6) Kamala recites the âstand back and stand byâ hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a âmilitiaâ to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check. 7) Kamala recites the âbloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.
About YouTube Real-Time View Count
With SocialCounts.orgâs view counter, track your YouTube videoâs live view count and YouTube likes count in real time with fast, reliable updates.
Watch every YouTube video live view count rise with our real-time YouTube views trackerâbuilt for accuracy and minimal delay.
Follow YouTube real time views as they happen, using our dedicated view counter for YouTube videos.
Get up-to-date live view count on YouTube and see real-time growth with SocialCounts.orgâs smart tracking tools.
Embed Widget
Parameters:
fullscreen=true- Fullscreen countergraph=true- Live graph chartcounter=0/1/2- Select counter (0=likes, 1=views, 2=comments)
URL
Click to copy the embed URL to your clipboard

