58
likes
5
comments
daily view 0
monthly view 0
Live Analytics
Comments 0
Ohio Law Enforcement Is Getting This Body Camera Fee Wrong. Here's the Statute. Analytics Table
Income Estimates for Ohio Law Enforcement Is Getting This Body Camera Fee Wrong. Here's the Statute.
Based on this YouTube video's total view count of 970 views and industry-standard rates, the estimated total earning is $1 - $2 through ad revenue. Historical data is not yet available to calculate daily, weekly, or monthly averages.
About Ohio Law Enforcement Is Getting This Body Camera Fee Wrong. Here's the Statute.
Explore Ohio Law Enforcement Is Getting This Body Camera Fee Wrong. Here's the Statute. with 970 views, 58 likes, and 5 comments. Experience the impact of this video content that has captured audience attention.
n part one we walked through three Garrettsville PD incident reports — two personal responses by Chief Tim Christopher and a welfare check on Christopher Perme that ended with a pink-slip and a hospital transport. The reports came. The body camera footage didn't. Garrettsville said they have three hours of footage. The bill is $225. Here's the problem. Their own CAD records — the ones they already gave me — show approximately four minutes on scene for the May 27 noise complaint and approximately 53 minutes for the June 2 welfare check. Combined: about 57 minutes of footage. Ohio Revised Code 149.43(B)(1), added by House Bill 315, says the fee is capped at "seventy-five dollars per hour of video produced." Not per hour of labor. Not per hour of staff time. Per hour of video produced. At that rate, 57 minutes of footage has a maximum lawful fee of about $71.25. I was charged $225. I paid it anyway — I'm not letting a fee dispute be the reason this footage sits in a drawer. I filed two challenge letters on July 19 contesting the exemption basis and the rate calculation. And on July 21 I sent a formal inquiry to the Ohio Attorney General's Sunshine Laws unit asking one question: does "per hour of video produced" mean per hour of footage length or per hour of labor? Because no Ohio court has answered that yet. This law took effect April 2025. The ACLU of Ohio challenged an identical fee structure in the Village of Brewster. NBC4 Columbus reported in October 2025 that legal experts identified this as a statewide misreading. The footage is paid for. The challenges are active. The AG has been notified. When this gets answered, you'll see it here first. PRR filed under Ohio Revised Code 149.43. All records referenced in this video are publicly available. Pro-Police. Not Pro-Corruption. Be loud. Be heard. Shake the system until the truth falls out. 00:00 $225 for 57 minutes — the number doesn't work 00:25 Who I am 01:04 What the last video covered 01:51 The fee — already paid, but I'm contesting it 02:00 Setting the record straight on the calls 03:00 Breaking down the $225 claim 03:19 The CAD math — 4 minutes and 53 minutes 04:00 RC 149.43(B)(1) — what the statute actually says 05:10 Being fair about what I don't know 05:27 The two challenge letters 06:39 This is a statewide problem — ACLU and NBC4 07:21 The AG inquiry 08:07 Where things stand right now 09:00 Call to action and close
About YouTube Real-Time View Count
With SocialCounts.org’s view counter, track your YouTube video’s live view count and YouTube likes count in real time with fast, reliable updates.
Watch every YouTube video live view count rise with our real-time YouTube views tracker—built for accuracy and minimal delay.
Follow YouTube real time views as they happen, using our dedicated view counter for YouTube videos.
Get up-to-date live view count on YouTube and see real-time growth with SocialCounts.org’s smart tracking tools.
Embed Widget
Parameters:
fullscreen=true- Fullscreen countergraph=true- Live graph chartcounter=0/1/2- Select counter (0=likes, 1=views, 2=comments)
URL
Click to copy the embed URL to your clipboard

