168懶人料理Lazy Renee
@168lazyrenee • Joined January 25, 2019
At a glance
168懶人料理Lazy Renee ranks #1,190,676 globally for subscribers (18.0K), #1,306,488 globally for views (3.04M), 234 videos published from TW.
Subscribers
18,092
Views
3,049,754
Videos
234
Charts
Subscribers, views & videos over time
Subscribers gained (weekly) · 6 mo
Views gained (weekly) · 6 mo
Engagement
Avg. views per video
13.0K
Total views ÷ total videos
Views per subscriber
169×
Total views ÷ subscribers
Subs per video
77
Subscribers ÷ total videos
Analytics tables
About
我不是專業廚師，也不是美食達人，就是個平平凡凡的資深上班族，兩點一線的生活著，周末下下廚，耍耍廢，懶人一枚。 做菜嘛，因為懶所以追求一鍋到底，你知道的洗起一堆鍋碗瓢盆來累死人。我們也就分享一些自己琢磨的懶人料理，作法不會太正規，料理苦手也能輕鬆上手的簡單料理。歡迎大家留言交流交流做菜心得。
- Handle
- @168lazyrenee
- Joined
- January 25, 2019
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
Frequently asked questions
How accurate are these YouTube channel analytics?
Subscriber, view, and video counts come from YouTube's public API and refresh regularly. Growth and revenue figures are estimates built from tracked historical data, so they can differ slightly from what a channel owner sees privately in YouTube Studio.
How is a channel's global and country rank calculated?
Rank compares this channel's subscriber count and view count against every other channel Socialcounts.org tracks, both worldwide and within its home country.
How is the revenue estimate calculated?
It's a rough public estimate based on a $0.7–$2.0 CPM (revenue per 1,000 views) applied to view counts — not actual creator earnings, which depend on ad rates, audience geography, and monetization settings YouTube doesn't expose publicly.
Can I check analytics for any YouTube channel, not just my own?
Yes — search any public YouTube channel by name, handle, or channel URL. No login is required to see the basics.
Is this YouTube channel analytics checker free?
Yes. You get 10 free channel and video analytics lookups per rolling hour without an account — logging in, which is also free, removes that limit entirely.