Joe Rogan Experience #203 - Jim Jefferies
Published April 11, 2013
At a glance
Views
437,408
Likes
2,215
Comments
531
Performance vs. channel
All-time outlier score
Engagement rate
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
About
- Published
- April 11, 2013
- Made for kids
- No
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
How Joe Rogan Experience #203 - Jim Jefferies is doing
It has 437K views in total. It ranks #7,381,159 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
Key facts about Joe Rogan Experience #203 - Jim Jefferies
- Total views
- 437K
- Total likes
- 2.21K
- Total comments
- 531
- Published
- April 11, 2013
- Global rank by views
- #7,381,159
Frequently asked questions
How many views does Joe Rogan Experience #203 - Jim Jefferies have?
Joe Rogan Experience #203 - Jim Jefferies has 437,408 views, 2,215 likes and 531 comments, ranking #7,381,159 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
How accurate are these YouTube video analytics?
View, like, and comment counts come from YouTube's public API and refresh regularly. Growth and revenue figures are estimates built from tracked historical data, so they can differ slightly from what the creator sees privately in YouTube Studio.
What is the outlier score?
How this video's views compare to the channel's usual Shorts or long-form video. A 2x score means double the usual views for that channel, 0.5x means half.
What is engagement rate and how is it calculated?
Likes and comments per view, compared to this channel's typical engagement rate — shown as above or below what's usual for the channel.
How is the revenue estimate calculated?
It's a rough public estimate based on a $0.7–$2.0 CPM (revenue per 1,000 views) applied to view count — not actual creator earnings, which depend on ad rates, audience geography, and monetization settings YouTube doesn't expose publicly.
Is this YouTube video analytics checker free?
Yes. You get 10 free channel and video analytics lookups per 24 hours without an account — logging in, which is also free, removes that limit entirely.