Jail time based on looks #shorts
Published March 7, 2026
At a glance
Views
835,075
Likes
23,659
Comments
218
Performance vs. channel
All-time outlier score
Engagement rate
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
About
- Published
- March 7, 2026
- Made for kids
- No
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
How Jail time based on looks #shorts is doing
It has 835K views in total. It ranks #5,391,308 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
Key facts about Jail time based on looks #shorts
- Total views
- 835K
- Total likes
- 23.6K
- Total comments
- 218
- Published
- March 7, 2026
- Global rank by views
- #5,391,308
Frequently asked questions
How many views does Jail time based on looks #shorts have?
Jail time based on looks #shorts has 835,075 views, 23,659 likes and 218 comments, ranking #5,391,308 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
How accurate are these YouTube video analytics?
View, like, and comment counts come from YouTube's public API and refresh regularly. Growth and revenue figures are estimates built from tracked historical data, so they can differ slightly from what the creator sees privately in YouTube Studio.
What is the outlier score?
How this video's views compare to the channel's usual Shorts or long-form video. A 2x score means double the usual views for that channel, 0.5x means half.
What is engagement rate and how is it calculated?
Likes and comments per view, compared to this channel's typical engagement rate — shown as above or below what's usual for the channel.
How is the revenue estimate calculated?
It's a rough public estimate based on a $0.7–$2.0 CPM (revenue per 1,000 views) applied to view count — not actual creator earnings, which depend on ad rates, audience geography, and monetization settings YouTube doesn't expose publicly.
Is this YouTube video analytics checker free?
Yes. You get 10 free channel and video analytics lookups per 24 hours without an account — logging in, which is also free, removes that limit entirely.