25:52Long-form

'우주가 거대한 블랙홀 속에 갇혀있다'는 주장이 매우 타당한 이유 (새로운 난제, 허블텐션..)

South KoreaPublished July 7, 2025

Views 516K  |  Likes 4.25K  |  Comments 413
Views#6,898,453Global
Views#149,982South Korea

Channel

보다 BODA보다 BODA
3.23M subs•2.07K videos•Jan 2013

At a glance

Views

516,790

Likes

4,250

Comments

413

Performance vs. channel

All-time outlier score

Engagement rate

Revenue estimate

Details →

Total (all-time): $362 – $1.03K

Based on estimated $0.7–$2 CPM.

About

오늘은 우주먼지님과 ‘블랙홀 속의 우주 이론’에 대한 이야기를 나누어 보았습니다. 00:00 오프닝 00:42 행성과 은하처럼, 우주도 돌고 있을까? 09:14 천문학계의 새로운 난제, 허블 텐션 15:22 우주가 한 바퀴 도는데 몇 년이 걸릴까? 18:49 우주가 블랙홀 속에 갇혀있다? 궁금하신 부분들을 댓글에 달아주세요! 저희가 확인하겠습니다! 감사합니다! 📖 우주먼님의 저서 [갈 수 없지만 알 수 있는 - 지구로부터 우주의 거리를 재] 교보문고 - https://product.kyobobook.co.kr/detail/S000216064767 yes…

Published
July 7, 2025
Made for kids
No

More features coming

We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.

How '우주가 거대한 블랙홀 속에 갇혀있다'는 주장이 매우 타당한 이유 (새로운 난제, 허블텐션..) is doing

It has 516K views in total. It ranks #6,898,453 among tracked YouTube videos by views.

Key facts about '우주가 거대한 블랙홀 속에 갇혀있다'는 주장이 매우 타당한 이유 (새로운 난제, 허블텐션..)

Total views
516K
Total likes
4.25K
Total comments
413
Published
July 7, 2025
Global rank by views
#6,898,453

Frequently asked questions

How many views does '우주가 거대한 블랙홀 속에 갇혀있다'는 주장이 매우 타당한 이유 (새로운 난제, 허블텐션..) have?

'우주가 거대한 블랙홀 속에 갇혀있다'는 주장이 매우 타당한 이유 (새로운 난제, 허블텐션..) has 516,790 views, 4,250 likes and 413 comments, ranking #6,898,453 among tracked YouTube videos by views.

How accurate are these YouTube video analytics?

View, like, and comment counts come from YouTube's public API and refresh regularly. Growth and revenue figures are estimates built from tracked historical data, so they can differ slightly from what the creator sees privately in YouTube Studio.

What is the outlier score?

How this video's views compare to the channel's usual Shorts or long-form video. A 2x score means double the usual views for that channel, 0.5x means half.

What is engagement rate and how is it calculated?

Likes and comments per view, compared to this channel's typical engagement rate — shown as above or below what's usual for the channel.

How is the revenue estimate calculated?

It's a rough public estimate based on a $0.7–$2.0 CPM (revenue per 1,000 views) applied to view count — not actual creator earnings, which depend on ad rates, audience geography, and monetization settings YouTube doesn't expose publicly.

Is this YouTube video analytics checker free?

Yes. You get 10 free channel and video analytics lookups per 24 hours without an account — logging in, which is also free, removes that limit entirely.