The WORST type of YouTuber…
Published September 1, 2024
At a glance
Views
6,115,920
Likes
370,638
Comments
2,466
Performance vs. channel
All-time outlier score
Engagement rate
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
About
- Published
- September 1, 2024
- Made for kids
- No
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
How The WORST type of YouTuber… is doing
It has 6.11M views in total. It ranks #1,368,454 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
Key facts about The WORST type of YouTuber…
- Total views
- 6.11M
- Total likes
- 370K
- Total comments
- 2.46K
- Published
- September 1, 2024
- Global rank by views
- #1,368,454
Frequently asked questions
How many views does The WORST type of YouTuber… have?
The WORST type of YouTuber… has 6,115,920 views, 370,638 likes and 2,466 comments, ranking #1,368,454 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
How accurate are these YouTube video analytics?
View, like, and comment counts come from YouTube's public API and refresh regularly. Growth and revenue figures are estimates built from tracked historical data, so they can differ slightly from what the creator sees privately in YouTube Studio.
What is the outlier score?
How this video's views compare to the channel's usual Shorts or long-form video. A 2x score means double the usual views for that channel, 0.5x means half.
What is engagement rate and how is it calculated?
Likes and comments per view, compared to this channel's typical engagement rate — shown as above or below what's usual for the channel.
How is the revenue estimate calculated?
It's a rough public estimate based on a $0.7–$2.0 CPM (revenue per 1,000 views) applied to view count — not actual creator earnings, which depend on ad rates, audience geography, and monetization settings YouTube doesn't expose publicly.
Is this YouTube video analytics checker free?
Yes. You get 10 free channel and video analytics lookups per 24 hours without an account — logging in, which is also free, removes that limit entirely.