WE PRETENDED TO BE MANNEQUINS 😱
Published February 20, 2025
At a glance
Views
691,065
Likes
54,781
Comments
200
Performance vs. channel
All-time outlier score
Engagement rate
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
About
We dressed up as mannequins at the mall. 😂
- Published
- February 20, 2025
- Made for kids
- No
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
How WE PRETENDED TO BE MANNEQUINS 😱 is doing
It has 691K views in total. It ranks #4,913,192 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
Key facts about WE PRETENDED TO BE MANNEQUINS 😱
- Total views
- 691K
- Total likes
- 54.7K
- Total comments
- 200
- Published
- February 20, 2025
- Global rank by views
- #4,913,192
Frequently asked questions
How many views does WE PRETENDED TO BE MANNEQUINS 😱 have?
WE PRETENDED TO BE MANNEQUINS 😱 has 691,065 views, 54,781 likes and 200 comments, ranking #4,913,192 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
How accurate are these YouTube video analytics?
View, like, and comment counts come from YouTube's public API and refresh regularly. Growth and revenue figures are estimates built from tracked historical data, so they can differ slightly from what the creator sees privately in YouTube Studio.
What is the outlier score?
How this video's views compare to the channel's usual Shorts or long-form video. A 2x score means double the usual views for that channel, 0.5x means half.
What is engagement rate and how is it calculated?
Likes and comments per view, compared to this channel's typical engagement rate — shown as above or below what's usual for the channel.
How is the revenue estimate calculated?
It's a rough public estimate based on a $0.7–$2.0 CPM (revenue per 1,000 views) applied to view count — not actual creator earnings, which depend on ad rates, audience geography, and monetization settings YouTube doesn't expose publicly.
Is this YouTube video analytics checker free?
Yes. You get 10 free channel and video analytics lookups per 24 hours without an account — logging in, which is also free, removes that limit entirely.