Who Would You Save?
Published July 14, 2025
At a glance
Views
20,000,882
Likes
397,667
Comments
42,141
Performance vs. channel
All-time outlier score
Engagement rate
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
About
Would you save your PARENTS or $1 BILLION? #roblox #shorts
- Published
- July 14, 2025
- Made for kids
- No
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
How Who Would You Save? is doing
It has 20.0M views in total. It ranks #416,194 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
Key facts about Who Would You Save?
- Total views
- 20.0M
- Total likes
- 397K
- Total comments
- 42.1K
- Published
- July 14, 2025
- Global rank by views
- #416,194
Frequently asked questions
How many views does Who Would You Save? have?
Who Would You Save? has 20,000,882 views, 397,667 likes and 42,141 comments, ranking #416,194 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
How accurate are these YouTube video analytics?
View, like, and comment counts come from YouTube's public API and refresh regularly. Growth and revenue figures are estimates built from tracked historical data, so they can differ slightly from what the creator sees privately in YouTube Studio.
What is the outlier score?
How this video's views compare to the channel's usual Shorts or long-form video. A 2x score means double the usual views for that channel, 0.5x means half.
What is engagement rate and how is it calculated?
Likes and comments per view, compared to this channel's typical engagement rate — shown as above or below what's usual for the channel.
How is the revenue estimate calculated?
It's a rough public estimate based on a $0.7–$2.0 CPM (revenue per 1,000 views) applied to view count — not actual creator earnings, which depend on ad rates, audience geography, and monetization settings YouTube doesn't expose publicly.
Is this YouTube video analytics checker free?
Yes. You get 10 free channel and video analytics lookups per 24 hours without an account — logging in, which is also free, removes that limit entirely.