
1억원어치 와인은 누가 마셨나, 50초 안에 설명하기
Published October 13, 2026
At a glance
Views
560,831
Likes
54,433
Comments
2,700
Performance vs. channel
All-time outlier score
Engagement rate
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
About
- Published
- October 13, 2026
- Made for kids
- No
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
How 1억원어치 와인은 누가 마셨나, 50초 안에 설명하기 is doing
It has 560K views in total. It ranks #6,654,945 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
Key facts about 1억원어치 와인은 누가 마셨나, 50초 안에 설명하기
- Total views
- 560K
- Total likes
- 54.4K
- Total comments
- 2.7K
- Published
- October 13, 2026
- Global rank by views
- #6,654,945
Frequently asked questions
How many views does 1억원어치 와인은 누가 마셨나, 50초 안에 설명하기 have?
1억원어치 와인은 누가 마셨나, 50초 안에 설명하기 has 560,831 views, 54,433 likes and 2,700 comments, ranking #6,654,945 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
How accurate are these YouTube video analytics?
View, like, and comment counts come from YouTube's public API and refresh regularly. Growth and revenue figures are estimates built from tracked historical data, so they can differ slightly from what the creator sees privately in YouTube Studio.
What is the outlier score?
How this video's views compare to the channel's usual Shorts or long-form video. A 2x score means double the usual views for that channel, 0.5x means half.
What is engagement rate and how is it calculated?
Likes and comments per view, compared to this channel's typical engagement rate — shown as above or below what's usual for the channel.
How is the revenue estimate calculated?
It's a rough public estimate based on a $0.7–$2.0 CPM (revenue per 1,000 views) applied to view count — not actual creator earnings, which depend on ad rates, audience geography, and monetization settings YouTube doesn't expose publicly.
Is this YouTube video analytics checker free?
Yes. You get 10 free channel and video analytics lookups per 24 hours without an account — logging in, which is also free, removes that limit entirely.