Who is The CheaterđŸ˜… #shorts
Published February 14, 2026
At a glance
Views
170,629
Likes
1,313
Comments
20
Performance vs. channel
All-time outlier score
Engagement rate
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
About
- Published
- February 14, 2026
- Made for kids
- No
More features coming
We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.
How Who is The CheaterđŸ˜… #shorts is doing
It has 170K views in total. It ranks #10,950,539 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
Key facts about Who is The CheaterđŸ˜… #shorts
- Total views
- 170K
- Total likes
- 1.31K
- Total comments
- 20
- Published
- February 14, 2026
- Global rank by views
- #10,950,539
Frequently asked questions
How many views does Who is The CheaterđŸ˜… #shorts have?
Who is The CheaterđŸ˜… #shorts has 170,629 views, 1,313 likes and 20 comments, ranking #10,950,539 among tracked YouTube videos by views.
How accurate are these YouTube video analytics?
View, like, and comment counts come from YouTube's public API and refresh regularly. Growth and revenue figures are estimates built from tracked historical data, so they can differ slightly from what the creator sees privately in YouTube Studio.
What is the outlier score?
How this video's views compare to the channel's usual Shorts or long-form video. A 2x score means double the usual views for that channel, 0.5x means half.
What is engagement rate and how is it calculated?
Likes and comments per view, compared to this channel's typical engagement rate — shown as above or below what's usual for the channel.
How is the revenue estimate calculated?
It's a rough public estimate based on a $0.7–$2.0 CPM (revenue per 1,000 views) applied to view count — not actual creator earnings, which depend on ad rates, audience geography, and monetization settings YouTube doesn't expose publicly.
Is this YouTube video analytics checker free?
Yes. You get 10 free channel and video analytics lookups per 24 hours without an account — logging in, which is also free, removes that limit entirely.