1:51Long-form

더위가 원인이 아니었다…KTX 선로 변형, 구조적 취약성 탓 / KBS 2026.10.13.

South KoreaPublished October 13, 2026

Views 53.1K  |  Likes 112  |  Comments 38
Views#12,512,632Global
Views#294,881South Korea

Channel

KBS NewsKBS News
3.72M subs•478K videos•Aug 2013

At a glance

Views

53,136

Likes

112

Comments

38

Performance vs. channel

All-time outlier score

Engagement rate

Revenue estimate

Details →

Total (all-time): $37 – $106

Based on estimated $0.7–$2 CPM.

About

지난 5월 KTX 강릉선에서 선로가 휘어져 열차 운행이 중단되는 사고가 있었는데요. 당시 국토교통부는 '때 이른 더위'를 원인으로 지목했는데, 코레일 최종 조사 결과 선로 자체의 구조적 결함 때문이었던 것으로 확인됐습니다. 정상빈 기자가 보도합니다. [리포트] 지난 5월, 고속 열차를 멈춰 세웠던 KTX 강릉선의 선로 휘어짐 사고. 당시 국토교통부는 갑작스러운 기온 상승에 따른 레일 팽창을 원인으로 지목했습니다. 하지만, 최종 조사 결과는 달랐습니다. KBS가 입수한 한국철도공사, 코레일의 사고 조사 보고서입니다. 사고 당시 선로 …

Published
October 13, 2026
Made for kids
No

More features coming

We're working on new analytics and tools. Stay tuned.

How 더위가 원인이 아니었다…KTX 선로 변형, 구조적 취약성 탓 / KBS 2026.10.13. is doing

It has 53.1K views in total. It ranks #12,512,632 among tracked YouTube videos by views.

Key facts about 더위가 원인이 아니었다…KTX 선로 변형, 구조적 취약성 탓 / KBS 2026.10.13.

Total views
53.1K
Total likes
112
Total comments
38
Published
October 13, 2026
Global rank by views
#12,512,632

Frequently asked questions

How many views does 더위가 원인이 아니었다…KTX 선로 변형, 구조적 취약성 탓 / KBS 2026.10.13. have?

더위가 원인이 아니었다…KTX 선로 변형, 구조적 취약성 탓 / KBS 2026.10.13. has 53,136 views, 112 likes and 38 comments, ranking #12,512,632 among tracked YouTube videos by views.

How accurate are these YouTube video analytics?

View, like, and comment counts come from YouTube's public API and refresh regularly. Growth and revenue figures are estimates built from tracked historical data, so they can differ slightly from what the creator sees privately in YouTube Studio.

What is the outlier score?

How this video's views compare to the channel's usual Shorts or long-form video. A 2x score means double the usual views for that channel, 0.5x means half.

What is engagement rate and how is it calculated?

Likes and comments per view, compared to this channel's typical engagement rate — shown as above or below what's usual for the channel.

How is the revenue estimate calculated?

It's a rough public estimate based on a $0.7–$2.0 CPM (revenue per 1,000 views) applied to view count — not actual creator earnings, which depend on ad rates, audience geography, and monetization settings YouTube doesn't expose publicly.

Is this YouTube video analytics checker free?

Yes. You get 10 free channel and video analytics lookups per 24 hours without an account — logging in, which is also free, removes that limit entirely.